[wutwutwutwut]

When people skim through something in a sloppy way and then focus on writing a rant about it I just don't take their view seriously. If people can't be bothered to carefully digest information, I just assume that they don't know what they are talking about. You may be right or wrong, but I would just choose to listen to people who did their homework instead.

[alexanderdmitri]

Seeing as these are the only two comments you've made on this thread, it seems like you're not ignoring what you claim should be ignored and taking all this a bit too seriously.

Whether it makes sense to add the stage name to a resource name is a decision that is informed by a wider context that includes hosting environment, deployment pattern and configuration approach. It can make sense in some situations and can be a bad idea in other situations.