Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by theptip 1797 days ago
It's hard for me to compare precisely, especially since the Intrinsic videos are sped up, but the one you linked looks very shaky and hesitant, and also the "Ikea challenge" seems like it requires more fine-tuned force-feedback than putting metal pieces together. If I anthropomorphize, the Stanford robot looks like an inept/hungover employee, whereas the Intrinsic robot seems convincing that it's actually accurately aware of what's going on.

Another possible difference -- how much programming time did it take to teach the Stanford robot to assemble the water pump? Sounds like Intrinsic trained the robots to do this with little supervision.

It seems to me that this might represent pretty solid progress, although not exponential/paradigm-shift scale like we've seen in some other industries in that period, and nothing in the Intrinsic videos seemed like it was above par for other automation companies I've seen recently. But since you seem to be in the industry, what's your take on whether they seem to be ahead of the game, or even just realistic, with claims like:

> In one instance, we trained a robot in two hours to complete a USB connection task that would take hundreds of hours to program. In other tests, we orchestrated multiple robot arms to assemble an architectural installation and a simple piece of furniture. None of this is realistic or affordable to automate today — and there are millions of other examples like this in businesses around the world.

1 comments

It's hard for me to compare precisely, especially since the Intrinsic videos are sped up

Here's a longer version in a larger size, either not sped up or not sped up so much.[1] It's using a simple strategy of approaching the socket at an slightly off angle and then twisting into alignment.

That's a standard strategy. Compare this video of assembling Lego blocks with an industrial robot. Note the little twist moves.[2]

Did the machine learning come up with that, or was it preprogrammed? Did ML re-invent remote center compliance? That would be progress.

Rod Brooks went down this road with Rethink Robotics. They went bust.

You can certainly do what they're showing. It's making a profit on it that's hard.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3cmDLgA2nM

[2] https://youtu.be/BNP74352vhg