|
|
|
|
|
by Ostrogodsky
1794 days ago
|
|
What is your point? You are not comparing against the general population to see if there is a difference. Also from the study: > Such a low vaccine efficiency against infection by the Gamma variant was not expected because in vitro studies have shown a similar reduction of neutralization for Beta or Gamma variants by BNT162b2-elicited antibodies (5) and a conserved CD4+ T-cell response against spike proteins from the Beta variant (6). So, no, this was not "business as usual", in fact the results are so shocking that the investigators wrote: > Given the surprisingly high attack rate, we hypothesized potential dysfunctions of conservation or administration of vaccines, but the absence of traceable cold-chain interruption and the use of different batches seemed to refute this hypothesis. So the study so far suggests that the Pfizer vaccines may well have an actual low effectivenes rate against this virus variant. |
|
They were not. They were obese and hypertensive. That is unhealty no matter what vaccines you take.