|
|
|
|
|
|
by ggm
1797 days ago
|
|
|
Is this about the semantics and syntax of English? Would your response be different in a hypothetical language where the pluralistic pet is (s)pet? How about if the plurality of pet was "scront" or "pet, uncountable many" Mapping English words with / as a separator and into a world of 4 or 6 action verbs is a huge constraint on "meaning" in the linguistic sense. |
|
|