|
|
|
|
|
|
by minsc__and__boo
1798 days ago
|
|
|
>would subsidize the electric vehicle sector to the tune of $174 billion The U.S. infrastructure deal was unanimously supported by all members of the house, not just the speaker. This type of uncertainty/doubt argument can go both ways. Her spouse lost money on that specific option call, so that could also be proof she didn't use her influence. |
|
|
No it wasn't. By all members with a (D) after the name who she leads, perhaps, and some others, but not all.
> that could also be proof she didn't use her influence
I don't find this a compelling enough argument that it would likely restore the public's lost trust in these institutions.