|
|
|
|
|
by tribeofone
5448 days ago
|
|
The being nimble and touchy relationship stuff is nice, but the real reason you dont need a cofounder is: why split the equity 50/50, 75/25 or whatever it is? You used to need partners to share risk (mainly the infusion of capital). In this industry there are very small barriers to entry, faster returns, and plenty of money available if you have a good idea. Meaning there is very little risk on the part of a entrepreneur. Why give up a substantial chuck of the equity for a "co-founder" when you can bring that same or similar person aboard 6 months later for a percent or two (5 at most) and get the same results. |
|
This line, more than anything else in the last year, is pinging my bubble radar. Ping, ping, ping!
It isn't skydiving without a parachute, but essentially everybody capable of doing a fundable business is also capable of getting a six figure job tomorrow in the current economic environment. If it takes 1.5 to 3 years of your life to discover that the brilliant idea to upend ad distribution through social networks on iPhones was not quite so brilliant, you've very much lost something. (1.5 to 3 years of your life, and, by the way, some money.)