|
|
|
|
|
by perl4ever
1800 days ago
|
|
>"The press" isn't some special legal entity, there's no licensing for it or anything This is one of those things that's plausible and common enough to read on the internet that it makes me worry about alternate universes intersecting. If you type "credentialed members of the media" into Google, do you see any results, or is it just me? Another key phrase I find is "reporter's privilege" relating to state laws to shield the press, which, as you might imagine, requires defining what a reporter is. "Some privilege schemes are narrow and apply only to full-time employees of professional news outlets, while others are broad and extend to bloggers, filmmakers, freelancers, book authors, and student journalists. In other words, some are inclusive and others are exclusive." https://www.cjr.org/united_states_project/journalists_privil... |
|