[sofixa]

A good news source would retract their initial article(s) when experts debunked them and nobody could corroborate, not double down with even less evidence.

[perl4ever]

It's notoriously hard to prove a negative.

But what I'd really like to know is who is a "good news source" in contrast to Bloomberg.

If one doubtful article discredits an entire organization, it's pretty astounding to me anyone worth trusting can exist. The Daily Mail?