Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by mcguire 1801 days ago
You missed a sentence.

"Many of the trials came from the same countries (Egypt, China, India, Iran, Japan, South Korea, and Turkey), and when John Ioannidis, a professor at Stanford University, examined individual patient data from trials submitted from those countries to Anaesthesia during a year he found that many were false: 100% (7/7) in Egypt; 75% (3/ 4) in Iran; 54% (7/13) in India; 46% (22/48) in China; 40% (2/5) in Turkey; 25% (5/20) in South Korea; and 18% (2/11) in Japan."

I find it particularly sad, since actively promoting academic integrity would do more for those countries than anything else, bang-for-your-buck-wise. Instead, many seem to be seeking the appearance of academic success.

(OTOH, I suppose Japan and South Korea may be on that list due to some kind intense pressure to succeed.)

1 comments

What about specifically applying increased scrutiny to institutions/countries/other identifiable cohorts? Is it too impolitic?