Not implementing the core of the protocol in something portable-library-friendly has been a real drag on IPFS. It's made it, in practice, more of a program than a protocol.
The counter-argument is that they'd not have made so much progress in the first place, in the short list of languages that qualify as portable-library-friendly.
The counter-argument is that they'd not have made so much progress in the first place, in the short list of languages that qualify as portable-library-friendly.