|
|
|
|
|
by toss1
1798 days ago
|
|
Yes, that is a good summary of Hanlon's Razor, a sort of corollary to Occam's Razor about mot creating unnecessary entities in your conceptual models. Hanlon's Razor is a good first approximation or initial approach to a situation, not the end of the discussion. There are many situations where incompetence may appear to be an explanation, but is in fact not the root cause, and may even be being actively used as a cover for malicious actions. The point of the razor is that it is up to us to sort out the difference, not to just jump to a conclusion that it is malice, or that it is incompetence. In this case, Amazon has had plenty of time, resources, and skilled people to see the need and implement an escalation & resolution pathway. That they have so persistently failed to do so for so long indicates a cause beyond mere incompetence. Even if they are not being as actively malicious as the malware distributors, they clearly and actively DGAF. |
|
So you are claiming that they have had so many opportunities to do the right thing, that they aren't merely incompetent, but are in bed with the evil doers? That would be a huge claim, to say the least.