|
|
|
|
|
by deregulateMed
1802 days ago
|
|
>towards anarchy Yet every democracy seems to tend toward dictatorships according to history. But I agree the idea behind liberalism is individuals, which anarchy makes sense. Given I have 3 to 5 government layers, Federal, State, city, HOA, and international law, I'd certainly prefer to get rid of a few of these layers due to corruption. |
|
How could a democracy end if not dictatorship? I suppose sinking beneath the waves is an alternative, but that is pretty rare.
If you want to have some fun reading up on Wikipedia's list of Empires [0], take some time to appreciate that the Republic of Venice being the longest-lived Western European empire. And I'm no expert in Venetian history (especially being as they have so much of it), but it seems to have had some solid democratic elements for around 700 years.
Democracies have a messy, difficult to categorise staying power. I hear stories about Kings and Emperors, but nobody talks about the enduring-like-weeds powers that don't have neatly defined figureheads but are hotbeds of prosperity. Look at Switzerland working through the World Wars for example. Really a minor miracle at that time in that place.
And world's largest empire (the British) spawned numerous highly successful democracies.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_empires