|
|
|
|
|
by Juliate
1796 days ago
|
|
> Oil companies don't have any special ability to predict the future state of a complex system. No, but they definitely have the scientific knowledge to understand the scale at which they pump CO2 into the atmosphere and the first-order consequences this has. > But anyway, how did Gore's predictions fare? It's like when you fly a plane, never trust the instruments: "yeah, sure, the altimeter is going down, but you know, we're still in the air. Besides, the altimeter has a margin of error, so... we're good." We have a song for that in France: "Tout va très bien, Madame la Marquise, tout va très bien, tout va très bien...". |
|
Check your hypothesis. There have been times in the past when CO2 went from, say, 3000 to 4000. Did the global average temperature do what you think it should?
> It's like when you fly a plane
I'm not seeing a number of correct predictions out of total predictions. What do we usually think when somebody has a hypothesis, and based on that hypothesis they make some testable predictions, and the predictions don't come true?