[jiggawatts]

This is 100% snake oil bullshit, right up there with anti-vaxxers and 5G conspiracy theories.

Even if true that DNA behaves as a "fractal antenna", which this paper does not establish in any way, the scales are all wrong.

The paper itself contains this little table of fractal sizes:

    DNA level       Diameter
    Double helix    1 nm
    Chromatin fiber 10 nm
    Solenoid        30 nm
    Hollow tube     200 nm 

Notice what it omits? The matching frequencies, which are trivial to compute thanks to the speed of light[1]:

    DNA level       Diameter     Frequency       Type
    Double helix      1 nm      300,000 THz    Soft X-Ray
    Chromatin fiber  10 nm       30,000 THz    Extreme Ultraviolet
    Solenoid         30 nm       10,000 THz    Far Ultraviolet
    Hollow tube     200 nm        1,500 THz    Ultraviolet

Then most of the rest of the paper talks about frequencies as low as 60 Hz, which have wavelengths about 25 trillion times longer than the ones in this table!

The conclusion -- of course -- is that WiFi which uses 2.4 to 6 GHz is dangerous:

> The proliferation of mobile phones, WiFi (wireless communication technology), etc. could lead to a large increase in mutations over a very short period of time.

This isn't even remotely science. It's a bunch of quacks that got their garbage published in PubMed, which is a low bar. There's nothing to see here until it turns up in Nature, and is replicated.

Read the paper for yourselves: https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2011.538...

[1] I've ignored the index of refraction of water, because it's a small, largely irrelevant difference. We're talking orders of magnitude here, and the paper is off by about 15 of them!

[peakaboo]

I agree about 5g but being against the new vaccines makes a lot of sense. Lots of evidence to support the serious side effects. People are adviced to not exercise after taking the vaccine due to deadly blood clots forming.

[jiggawatts]

I'm talking about the "general purpose" anti-vaxxers that were around before COVID and are responsible for hundreds of children dead around the world from preventable diseases like measles.

But COVID vaccines are also much safer than the disease they prevent.

Here in Australia is a perfect example of vaccine hesitancy versus hard reality.

For months on end we had close to zero cases in most states, people could do pretty much whatever with minimal restrictions. Every once in a while some returning traveller would cause a small outbreak, a few people might wind up in hospital, but we had zero cases on intubators, and zero deaths for ages.

There were protests in the street against COVID vaccines, which aren't mandatory here, and still aren't available for half the population. I have two acquaintances and a close relative that are refusing vaccination. The relative in particular is in an extremely high-risk category for serious COVID complications but is still unprotected.

Their logic was this: something like 3 people have died from the vaccines, and 0 from COVID. Hence, the vaccine is clearly much more dangerous than COVID.

We now have a relatively tiny(!) outbreak of just over a thousand cases that has sent three states into lockdowns, and a stage-4 lockdown of our most populous city.

These mere 1,100 cases have already killed 3 people, but those 3 vaccine deaths were from 10 million doses!

So the anti-vaxxer logic is: We prefer never-ending ruinous lockdowns and 10,000x more deaths because taking personal action is too scary if it has any risk of death associated with it. In other words, they got a headache when they heard about the Trolley Problem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_problem

PS: All three of those people drive like maniacs.