[theandrewbailey]

> I don't want to give my money to companies that host things that I find morally abhorrent.

Isn't that a sign of a moral panic? Back in the 90s, my parents didn't want to patronize companies that signed deals with pornographers. Even though I was only 10, that sounded ridiculous. Good luck finding any large company that doesn't.

[landryraccoon]

I don’t see what’s changed. Youtube doesn’t host pornographic content either. The Apple App store doesn’t allow adult content of any kind. If you’re saying maybe Youtube and the Apple store should grow up a little and allow adult content I’m sympathetic but the horse has long left the barn on that one.

[eurasiantiger]

> Youtube doesn’t host pornographic content

While they don’t host porn, they do host a host of porn performers.

[Chris2048]

Did the local utilities (water, electric) refuse them to pornographers, and did you parents boycott those?

[jjeaff]

Just how many modern companies do you think are actively dealing in pornography?

[lostlogin]

Can you explain this? Are you referring to tech only? Maybe I’m way too oblivious but of the large companies I pay money to I find it hard to imagine that most are signing deals with pornographers.

[michaelmrose]

If people wont do business with people who do business with pornographers what right do the pornographers or porn aficionados have to object. If it would render it more clear it wouldn't matter if the subject were avocados. It's not a moral judgement on the worthiness of porn its about consumer choice in aggregate.