Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by rossmiller 1802 days ago
Well, to be fair, in a pilot you don't generally see a full implementation of whatever is being piloted. If it works on the most vulnerable population, maybe the program will grow.
1 comments

Would it not have been easier to just choose people at random from California’s population? Then it would have been actually universal.
As long as you're prepared for the political backlash when someone is unhappy with the selection.

For example, if you're randomly selecting 100 people the odds of getting someone in the 1% are ~2/3. Making UBI payments to someone in the 1% would likely kill this experiment.

There would be political backlash. But there’s political backlash right now with this program because it’s not universal.

If a ubi program is universal that means the wealthy can’t complain that the poor are the only one being it.