[JamieEi]

His account was created 106 days ago and has 7 posts, 4 of which are about Anon/Lulz. From this you conclude that he is a sock puppet paid by someone (the FBI?) to lead us astray with his constant one liners. Seems like a stretch, but hey that's just me.

[Udo]

I'm not saying he's leading anyone astray. But I do think it's a sock puppet account, yes. Just not a very effective one, that's why I made the mistake of trying to provide some feedback. But hey, that's just me.

[gapanalysis]

Not a sock puppet, sorry to disappoint. Should I say more? I think "do no harm" applies when you claim to be an activist. I can't justify an attack as a protest or retaliation against governments, corporations who act contrary to the public interest, fundamentalists, or individual sock puppets when you harm others by disclosing personal information, disrupting business, etc. The fact that you want to "out" someone or some organization and you can't find a legal way to do it doesn't justify doing whatever you decide is the best course of action. And if you do decide to break the law in protest, perhaps you might consider manning up and identifying yourself like Ghandi or King.

[Udo]

Thanks for getting back to this, and for the clarification. So there is someone at home after all ;-) Btw, I get where you're coming from, and I don't disagree with you on this subject.