|
|
|
|
|
by cracker_jacks
1806 days ago
|
|
When you make housing an investment, by definition, it has to become less affordable in the future. Until a country decides to stop making policy to support this notion that a basic need should be an appreciating asset and not a depreciating one like food, transportation, etc, this completely unsurprising trend will continue. It is a strange world we live in where we collectively believe that a basic need should appreciate in value over time. |
|
It doesn't have to. Even if it just matches inflation you could call it an investment. If it keeps up with wage growth, that's a pretty good investment that doesn't force it to become less affordable. Or it could be somewhere in between, and then housing would be a reasonable investment and increasingly affordable over time.
The issue isn't that it's an investment at all, it's that it's much too good of an investment for multiple reasons.