I don't. If they did, they'd recognize the fact that the entire concept of "Apps", collaboration, etc..., are examples of ways human beings assemble tools to interact.
Terminals are one of the most direct ways to interact with hardware. If you need to share your hardware with someone else, then you share your screen or a recording. If you need to share your environment or she'll settings, you share scripts.
There's nothing to terminal use to be gained by trying to shoehorn in more net connections, and more uncertainty by merging in more sources of input. By cramming that in you are doing the opposite of caring about users. You're introducing extra elements that can break, decreasing the overall learnability of the system.
Yeah, I mean maybe I'm overreacting -- I'm all for a better terminal, and there's some genuinely cool stuff here -- it's just undermining its own case by overselling IMO.
Terminals are one of the most direct ways to interact with hardware. If you need to share your hardware with someone else, then you share your screen or a recording. If you need to share your environment or she'll settings, you share scripts.
There's nothing to terminal use to be gained by trying to shoehorn in more net connections, and more uncertainty by merging in more sources of input. By cramming that in you are doing the opposite of caring about users. You're introducing extra elements that can break, decreasing the overall learnability of the system.