Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by viztor 1796 days ago
In Google's defense, they aren't the market leader, that's zoom, they are the market challenger. So by definition, they can't be anti-competitive in the market of video conferencing tools, even though Google's otherwise enormous.
1 comments

You can definitely be anti-competitive as a market challenger. Uber (with their subsidised fairs) would the obvious example of that.
If anything, Uber was competitive instead of anti-competitive. Anti-competitive by definition only applies to potential monopoly.

see FTC: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/anticompetitive-practices