|
|
|
|
|
by re-al
1808 days ago
|
|
Of course controlled burns have been known about for centuries - these are not mysteries! But why in the modern age do we NOT control burn - that is the question. Putting aside the climate change being out of control, can we try to consider this from a 'perception management' perspective. If there are lots of huge fires that would create the impression in the news of huge climate change issues, would it not? But, would that be a fair assessment, if the huge fires have been orchestrated by a failure to do what we have known about for centuries? I don't think so. But using this issue to create the impression of climate is what is happening - eg the fires last year is Australia. These were framed as another massive climate change issue, not as a governmental failure (to undertake controlled burns). The effect is that we wring our hands over another massive climate change issue going unaddressed, whereas what is going on is a contrived situation that is framed on climate change. TLDR: These fires are *not* climate change - its only *portrayed* as climate change. |
|