|
|
|
|
|
by geocar
1805 days ago
|
|
> If I make software I can see that if I hacked a giant crap of code together that I would want to clean it up before releasing it to public and save my self the embarrassment knowing I could do it better. I think hardware is the same way. There's also protocols to fabrication that may be difficult to explain. You have support requests and emails wasting your time. > "enough positive interest from the community". I don't understand that. I read it as opposed to negative interest. > If I make software I can see that if I hacked a giant crap of code together that I would want to clean it up before releasing it to public and save my self the embarrassment knowing I could do it better. You should not be made to feel ashamed for giving something away for free. You should not even suggest that this should be acceptable. It isn't. People who offer comments on code beyond how to add material functionality (i.e. more inputs), make it faster, or decrease the code size are trash humans. Delete and ignore. |
|
I strongly disagree. Making code more maintainable and easy to understand is very important. Enforcing style guides is important