[burgessaccount]

Or it’s possible that your public school helped make you into the person your professor thought had potential.

Re: Seattle. I didn’t say “the public school system is perfect and never does anything stupid.” I said, “it is a net-good for the government to provide free education, which people can then improve upon with more expensive private or family options.” Surely that distinction will not be lost on a Caltech grad :)

[WalterBright]

You also wrote:

> Perhaps some public high schools do not make some people fully ready for Caltech

which implies that they, in general, do much better than I'm suggesting. But an objective test would be, does a public high school diploma command more pay? What does it mean in the job market?

[burgessaccount]

No, the test is, does a public high school diploma command more pay than no high school diploma? And the answer is a resounding yes. As I have noted, multiple times, in this discourse, I think there is a role for private education, and I think it can do wonderful things. But It is a costly model whose social and economic benefits depend, in part, in exclusivity. If you hadn’t gone to your “worthless” public school, that doesn’t mean you would have suddenly gone to Dalton. It means you would, most likely, either not have gone to high school, or gone into debt to attend a more expensive school. Presumably you think your option was better? That means that public schools are a net good that should exist.

[WalterBright]

> It is a costly model

Have you looked into what taxpayers pay per student for public schools? There's nothing inexpensive about them.

My high school did have a competition grade swimming pool, which was only used for the diving team consisting of maybe 8 people.

> does a public high school diploma command more pay than no high school diploma?

Yes, I agree that's the question.

> the answer is a resounding yes

Are you sure about that? Don't include people who have more advanced degrees.