|
|
|
|
|
|
by makeitdouble
1806 days ago
|
|
|
IMO this case is not just about the price, the perceived fairness plays a central role. From the article: > Benoit and the team at Electrified Garage are huge proponents of Right to Repair and say that this is a lesson on that very subject. I also think that it’s still a good case. The owner wanted an alternative to just throwing away the $16000 part, and found a shop that provided a legit way to do that (until proven otherwise at least). Hopefully getting punished for choosing alternatives to Tesla to service it would be prohibited by right to repair clauses. |
|
|