[ak217]

To be clear, I was only mentioning vi and emacs together because both have incredibly passionate communities that can be quite myopic to the UX deficiencies of their platforms. I have a lot of muscle memory committed to emacs so I still use it a lot, but I can onboard a dozen junior developers onto vscode in the time it takes me to help someone figure out emacs. And to me, the final missing piece that made vscode suitable as a general purpose replacement for emacs was the remote dev plugin.

[throwawayboise]

The UX is 90% a matter of what you know and what you are familiar with coming in.

I had to figure out how to do rectangular copy/paste in vscode, and it took just as long as it did to figure it out in emacs.

[cwyers]

Yeah. Quitting vim has the most trafficked Stack Overflow page:

https://stackoverflow.blog/2017/05/23/stack-overflow-helping...

"Most people don't know how to use vim and emacs" is both incredibly controversial around these parts and totally true.

[hashkb]

What's controversial? That people who say they know vim actually don't?

[patrick451]

You onboard new hires to an editor? That's ... surprising to say the least.

[square_usual]

It's not that out of the way. The previous place I worked, we had to help new hires get their editor set up, because most of them hadn't used Ruby/Rails before and didn't know what they'd need. We had an onboarding doc that helped you get started with Code + Solargraph, RubyMine or Sublime + Solargraph so they'd have features they'd have used in other languages. Apart from that, we'd also have to guide them through getting the editor set up to do things like format on save etc. to ensure the codebase was clean.