Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ChrisRR 1806 days ago
"He calls it “a quest on keeping the combustion engine alive in a fossil free future”."

And why is that a good thing?

1 comments

That comment seems tongue-in-cheek to me.

But to attempt a serious answer to your question; a large quantity of CH4 is produced in nature which eventually - after about 8 years - turns to CO2 and water in the atmosphere. But carbon in the form of methane is about 30 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas.

If this hastens the natural process and turns the CH4 into CO2 immediately, then the earth will be subject to less greenhouse effect then just allowing the methane to naturally oxidize.