|
|
|
|
|
by Gwypaas
1802 days ago
|
|
So 9% of seropositive and 10% of seronegative reported at least one symptom beyond 4 weeks. I.e. the background level is around 10% and the seronegative had "more" long covid than the ones who actually had covid in that group. Although this is pure randomness with such close measurements. |
|
> Although this is pure randomness with such close measurements.
That's not how this works at scale. We need larger studies, yes, but you can't simply dismiss a doubling of long-term symptom reports.
At population scale, even a 1-2% incidence means millions of people.