|
|
|
|
|
by natrius
5448 days ago
|
|
There are other ways to achieve the goal of breaking the link between employment and healthcare without a public insurer. Public insurers eventually become the predominant insurer by a large margin because they can use their size to obtain lower prices. Markets with few buyers or sellers are less efficient at providing the products people want at the prices they want than those with many. The result in this case would be less profit to be made in healthcare than people would be willing to pay for, so less effort would be spent to do so. Seems undesirable. This is trending a bit off topic. Feel free to respond, but I won't. |
|
Your theory may be interesting but is completely opposite from reality.