[tablespoon]

> While the article seems part-advertisement

It's all advertisement. The first paragraph is "Spoiler alert: their funds secured via Casa multisig remain safe."

> the risk is real.

I'm not so sure, I think there's a good chance this was made up. Unless this victim let on how much cryptocurrency he had early on in the conversation, this whole scenario seems too high-risk/low-reward to be very real. I mean, a Tinder account backed by a real person (supposedly with real photos to not put off the mark), waiting for people interested in cryptocurrency to steal it? Not drugging a lot of small fish who were bragging and attracting the attention of the police before finding a whale?

[Cthulhu_]

Here's one take: You don't go around calling yourself a crypto trader if you do not have a significant stake. The victim engaged with the thief because they too had "I am a crypto trader" in their bio, which indicates they may be equally wealthy. It's a kind of financial classism, common financial ground, possibly "falling into wealth" from low investments, etc.

[tablespoon]

> Here's one take: You don't go around calling yourself a crypto trader if you do not have a significant stake.

I think the flaw with that is that I could totally see some unemployed dude who took his meager savings and went all /r/wallstreetbets into dogecoin describing themselves the same way on a dating app. I guess the question is, which one is closer to the more typical case?