[DivisionSol]

Because 99% of our job is putting together standard logic that should've been included in most language's standard library?

Automate the rote software engineering so it's built upon a shared, healthy, secure, etc codebase... Leaving only the harder, more-fun 1% for us to noodle on instead.

[yarg]

The standard patterns that frequently emerge within languages are often low complexity special cases of potentially more powerful constructs and usage paradigms.

I might start with a simple for loop:

  for(int i = 0; i < limit; i++){
      ...
  }

And then decide that I can make it more concise:

  for(int i: [0 .. limit]){
      ...
  }

But I still need the base form, for less likely scenarios:

  for(int i = 1; i < limit; i <<= 1){
      ...
  }

A language or its libraries can support new cleaner forms for fundamental structures and frequently repeated boilerplate constructs - but it increases library/compiler complexity, cannot always be predicted ahead of time and often sacrifices power for specificity and apparent language simplicity.