[ChuckMcM]

Short answer, one looks like a newspaper.

The longer answer is that the newspapers are struggling financially, Google is not struggling, when snippets of content appear on the Google news page the newspapers believe they are 'improving' the Google brand without being compensated. They sued to have either Google pay them, or remove them from the News site.

What they fail to realize (and Google no doubt knows) is that if you aren't listed in Google you're not going to get nearly as much traffic (hence 'profit'). So Google apparently took a literal interpretation of the order and struck them from the books as it were, complete removal from the index.

So the newspapers have to make the following evaluation, 'what is it worth to us to be in Google's search results?' And is that value more or less than what we think they owe us for having our results on their news page?

Google clearly understands that its value for them to be in the search results and I believe they would say off the record that the value of being in the results is worth more than the ad revenue they get from the occasional story that makes it to the front page of Google news.

Sort of extortion, sort of natural consequences. Humorous though.