|
|
|
|
|
by cartoonworld
1805 days ago
|
|
Yes, proprietary software is negative in the freedom dimension. You have to realize that what your saying here is a category error: The libre alternatives don't have billions of dollars of marketing, engineering, market cap and users. EFF here is trying to point out exactly what you are espousing. These kind of dark patterns are used at all levels to drive engagement, including sign up and retention. ("But ... How will I be able to talk to my friends if I delete Facebook??") I can't recommend a solution, but "Well, its free, what do you expect?" is even worse. |
|
(Yes, indeed, the law works by coercion in the common interests. But I don't see any law having been broken here.)
So yes, it's free to play — what did you expect? Too much? Memorize this, and remember next time. Tell your friends and relatives what to not expect. Name and shame the entities which did something unsavory: this helps make users less gullible, and through that, nudges companies to be more careful.
Consider avoiding the use of stuff you don't control for important things. Be conscious when consuming free candy from a for-profit entity, even if you think your interests are currently aligned. But don't force anybody's hand.