|
|
|
|
|
by canoebuilder
1807 days ago
|
|
Quote marks can be easily misinterpreted, I was just using the phrase you used, my bad. “Faintest bit of background”
Meaning, your two competing hypotheses leave out pretty much everything that is known at this point, not an academic credential or such, just a basic reading on the known facts at this point. “Natural origin” was the leading hypothesis from the start more than a year ago. At this point, there is no evidence for it, there is substantial evidence against it, and the pile of circumstantial evidence for the Wuhan lab being the source is a mile high. |
|