Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fartcannon 1808 days ago
No, that's much worse. Then we'd exhaust our devs playing wack-a-mole.
1 comments

More exhausting than developing towards an entirely different (and often redundant) feature set without any help from upstream? That's what is usually meant by "fork." If you want the minimal effort option and you don't care about new features or security fixes at all, you can just stick with an old version, no fork is necessary there either.
I do care about security, privacy and integrity. So, I'm going to use the fork.