|
|
|
|
|
by diolpah
5449 days ago
|
|
Serious question, no troll. Why do so many young developers insist on getting mentoring when there is so much high quality code available to be read? I can accept the proposition that reading books is insufficient for becoming a spectacular developer. But code itself is so precisely clear about its use and intention, that it's effectively equivalent to peering inside the mind of its author.In addition, reading through changelogs can give an excellent view of how good software evolves from version to version. I would argue that doing so would be roughly equivalent in effect to actual mentoring. |
|
Reading code is valuable. It's not a substitute for actually working with experienced people on real projects. I can look through the Linux source all I want, but that doesn't tell me what it was like to sit down at a blank editor window and start writing an operating system, or how Linux evolved from simple test program to terminal emulator to bootable OS.