[X0nic]

Stablecoins / Central Bank Digital Currencies are equivalent to AOL vs the Internet.

Why would I hold stablecoins that are getting devalued at a MINUMUM of 2% per year over Bitcoin that has gone up in value on average at over 200% a year for the last 10 years. Not to mention other cryptos.

[legutierr]

By the same logic, why would you (or anyone else) ever spend your Bitcoin if it is increasing in value so quickly?

There's a reason that central banks target low inflation rates (meaning, single-digit devaluation rates)—because people over-hesitate to spend their money if it is experiencing deflation. Why would they spend their money, if waiting a month to make a purchase means that the same amount of money can buy 10% more of the thing they are buying?

Sure, it makes sense that you won't want to keep most of your savings in cash. But that doesn't mean that stablecoins are the equivalent of AOL.

If we want blockchains to act as viable payment media suitable for day-to-day use, people need to be willing to spend their blockchain assets. Precisely because of inflation/devaluation, stablecoins are assets that people are willing to spend.

[tuesdayrain]

>By the same logic, why would you (or anyone else) ever spend your Bitcoin if it is increasing in value so quickly?

That's exactly why I spend little as possible on things other than BTC. As a rough estimate, if I buy a good for $PRICE today I'm likely forfeiting around $PRICE*10 in 5-10 years which I would have if I bought BTC instead. Really highlights the opportunity cost of buying goods instead of investing.