[majormajor]

> Deductions are the real "lever" that the ultra rich use, since you can lobby the feds to implement whatever you want. This is why when tax rates post WWII were "over 90%" in top brackets nobody actually paid those taxes. Ironically, in that period most people who would be subject to that tax just took sabbaticals (of sorts) and reduced their income.

Did they not pay because they had magic deductions or did they not pay because of sabbaticals and reduced income? Because the former means it was no better than today (and income differential stats around CEO vs line-level employer suggest this is not true), but the latter is by its very nature better than today. It's literally creating more opportunity for more people to earn money? If person A isn't doing the work and making the income, person B is. So inequality will be less!

That high tax rate disincentives a small set of super-high-earners from running ever-more parts of the world? Good!

[bpt3]

> It's literally creating more opportunity for more people to earn money? If person A isn't doing the work and making the income, person B is. So inequality will be less!

That's not how things work in reality. Whatever work Jeff Bezos decides to not do as a salaried employee doesn't get distributed elsewhere, because he derives almost no income from his salary.