You need to explain this better, not just be patronizing towards people who disagree with or misunderstand you. So far, your only explanation is that is possible to bypass "sentiment analysis", which doesn't make sense.
Is not a "narrow view" of security. Your example is not secure, period, which is fine, because that's not where security needs to happen.
Is not a "narrow view" of security. Your example is not secure, period, which is fine, because that's not where security needs to happen.