|
|
|
|
|
|
by _rpd
1816 days ago
|
|
|
> But I also don't see what's wrong with attempting to distribute (some of) the revenue in such a way to compensate for harms. It becomes a big political fight over how much of the revenue should be directed to social programs, so the tax policy changes every 4 years. A straight rebate gets wide support and taking it away becomes more and more unpopular as people get used to receiving it. |
|
|