|
|
|
|
|
|
by woodruffw
1808 days ago
|
|
|
> Comparing it to coal is precisely "better than the worst". Coal is the worst option, and even the US is phasing it out rapidly. I don't think anybody disagrees with that. The claim is only that there are lots of sufficient reasons for nuclear power that don't stop at "it's not the worst." |
|
|