|
|
|
|
|
|
by fredsters_s
1809 days ago
|
|
|
First off, we totally agree on this: "true product Quality is dependent upon an endemic cultural philosophy of an organization." What we're asking you to consider is how much of that is because the tooling is shutting out the roles who are naturally incentivized to care about product quality? I think your broader thesis, while amusing, is ignoring some of the biggest and most valuable brands ever created... Apple, Rolex, Mercedes... |
|
|
Hey, thanks for the condescension. I thought we didn't do things like that on HN, but I am often wrong.
I actually worked for one of them "biggest and most valuable brands" for a couple of decades, so there's a good chance that my "thesis" might have legs.
Look, I actually agree with a lot of what you wrote, but I wasn't deliberately calling your baby ugly, and don't really appreciate the reaction. I did not mean to attack you, and am actually sorry that my comment was perceived as such. If I could delete the first line of my comment, I would. It's accurate, but I can see it as being inflammatory.
[EDIT] I'll see if @dang, or someone, can delete it.