|
|
|
|
|
by snarf21
1817 days ago
|
|
Well said. My current rule based on experience is that estimates should only be hours/days/weeks/months/quarters/years with NO numbers. It is to give a sense of scale and effort so it could be prioritized and/or modified. If they want exact dates, then it is like you said, several days/weeks to go get an accurate date. I only wish that the sales team had to commit to closing dates the same way software teams do. |
|
Start at the high end, will it take... years: NO quarters: NO months: erm... NO. weeks: maybe days: Unlikely hours: Ha. No.
So you end up with a range (days?-weeks-months). That's too broad, what could go wrong to avoid making it months long project (well we could investigate X, Y, and watch for Z). What needs to go perfect for it to be days? (well we could... wait, days is unlikely).
Those discussions about the high and the low to get "reasonable" confidence are super important.