|
|
|
|
|
|
by yellow_lead
1810 days ago
|
|
|
Because it's written by someone who (as they admit) first learned about it recently from a tweet. It appeals to laymen very well, but conflates "Zero knowledge" and "Zero knowledge proofs" throughout the article. Not sure if that's intentional or not. Edit: Learned it was important from a recent tweet*. it seems the author may have already known what they are. |
|
|