|
|
|
|
|
by Joky
1811 days ago
|
|
> The problem in this case is a chicken-and-egg problem: it's hard to get money without an education, and it's hard to get an education without money.
> For-profit education cannot solve the problem, because for-profit education is the problem. Have you seen school that only gets paid after you start working (and based on a percentage of your salary), for example: https://www.holbertonschool.com
I like the concept in that these school are somehow "investing" in the student: they only get as successful as the student is. |
|
This is reflected in what Holberton offers: if I'm understanding correctly, they offer 7 different kinds of computer programming and 0 different kinds of pre-med, elementary education, psychology, etc. While nobody would argue that these aren't necessary components of our society, they don't fit Holberton's business model--a student with an elementary ed degree doesn't walk out of Holberton and start making close to six figures with which to pay Holberton back.
There's nothing wrong with having a more focused school, of course, but realize that the way Holberton is getting around the chicken-and-egg problem I'm talking about is by picking a field of education where there isn't a chicken-and-egg problem: you don't need a degree to work in computer programming. And in fact, you don't need to take classes at Holberton: I know two different programs that will pay you to learn computer programming, instead of you paying. This has done exactly nothing to solve the problem I'm talking about: it just avoids it.