|
|
|
|
|
by reedjosh
1814 days ago
|
|
I like your comment, and I agree the Swiss are probably free-er at this point--but we were something of a free nation at one time, and we still (Orwellian?) bill ourselves as such. > There are tons of central databases you are already registered in, all available on demand. Most of these are not ran by the government though. Thus their use is not mandated. > your freedom ends where other's begins In libertarian circles this is generally spoken about as the `non-aggression principle`. I in no way think that a proof of vaccination system put together by private providers, coupled with businesses' choice to check vaccination status is wrong. I do think the responsible thing to do is somewhere along the lines of self isolating to either being vaccinated or having an antibody test. My objection is a government orchestrated vaccination database with mandated use in private businesses. edit: I don't know why you're being downvoted, but I did upvote you for the thoughtful commentary. : ) |
|
In Arizona, it's required that all immunizations given to <=18s are reported (along with "encouragement" for providers to report adult immunizations) and this is the basis for determining if the child may attend a public school, for example.