|
|
|
|
|
by fghfghfghfghfgh
1815 days ago
|
|
Those statements are not in opposition to each other, > Because obviously walking around and insulting people based on their race or religion is an act of violence If you define an insult to be violent in the same way as taking a life then I see why we are so far from each other. I make a clear distinction between the two. Do you really think an insult is an act of violence? I'm curious why you would think that Inciting to violence and performing a violent act is not the same thing. If they were one could defer responsibility to the actor who incited one to be violent. That ends all personal responsibility for ones own actions. > I think you lack the historical culture and can't understand the context of these texts. Such derogatory remarks does not further any conversation. I'm here to debate - to learn - to expose myself to different worlds. I hope you are as well. Question - don't assume. |
|