|
|
|
|
|
|
by dijit
1823 days ago
|
|
|
MySQL directly competes. But Postgres and MSSQL are the true equivalents, you’re right. Correctness is hard was my main comment. There’s a whole class of other database types, but oracle can do NOSQL document storage just fine. Postgres and MSSQL can too, especially the former, but there are some weird quirks, like having documents larger than 16KiB means they’re stored off-row in a compressed TOAST table. Which hurts performance a lot. |
|
|