|
|
|
|
|
by nv-vn
1812 days ago
|
|
I think maybe the key idea I was missing here is that the type of a variable is not always the same as the type of the scope it was defined in? If I'm understanding correctly, there's an implicit rule that's missing: a : la b : lb a := b
--------------------------
a : lb
So for example if `b : lb`: a := b :>>
doSomething()
need not have a type `>= lb`.Does that sound vaguely correct? Btw thanks for clarifying |
|