|
|
|
|
|
|
by vincent-toups
1821 days ago
|
|
|
This really strikes me as a "not even wrong" post. I'm not sure there is anything wrong with programming and if there is something wrong with it, the problem sure isn't "there are not enough operators." My favorite languages don't even have the _idea_ of operators and in languages with custom operators, with all their crazy ass rules about precedence and content-free representations, I'm always re-translating the code to s-expressions in my mind. The Scheme way seems fine to me - operator-like functions when the meaning is universally understood and then human-readable names for literally everything else. |
|
|