|
|
|
|
|
by tinganho
1816 days ago
|
|
I have never heard of verified compiler before. Not entirely sure if I understand everything from their docs either. But here are my thoughts. Even though you cannot unit test everything. I would still prefer it, then to have another compiler pass to ensure C semantics are the same as the compiled code. Even though compiled code is the same as C. C code can be buggy from the start. I don't understand the use of "mathematically proven" in this context as well. Proving that x86 add instruction or a set of x86 instruction has the same as the semantics of the C code, is just pure computer science problem, not mathematic? |
|